I've been teaching and mentoring young academic writers for more than three decades. And I can say with certainty that most of my studentsand essay writer suffer from the same disease: a failure to explain what they are talking about in simple terms. Some scholars seem convinced, whether consciously or not, that their research is so arcane, their findings so recondite, and their expertise so thorough that only a handful of people in the world could understand them. So rather than trying to find a way to reach out to non-experts—readers who have no idea what this stuff is all about—they just keep writing papers like the last ones they wrote when they were getting started.
When it comes to trying to relate your research findings to non-experts, for example, you'll see this phenomenon at work in papers on the history of a war or numismatics or ancient cults or whatever. You know the kind: they refer to generals and emperors and battles and dates by number instead of name. And it's not just that they never tell us who Hannibal was—they often don't even tell us which war he fought in! Over time I've tried to come up with a list of academic writing styles that stand out because they are so weirdly uninformative about what they're talking about. In the end I came up with six types :
The Use-less Generalization: this is an essay or article that tells us something obvious but useless. Example: "The number of people in the labor force has grown over the past four decades." So ?
The Vague Superlative: this is an essay or article that tells us something trivial but astonishing. Example: " This paper will be highly original ." How can it be both original and trivial?
The Hyper-technical Inversion: this is an essay or article written by someone who wants to impress his/her or free essay writer peers with a vocabulary full of jargon words, terms and phrases that only those in the subfield understand. Example: "After replication and extension, these findings support the conclusion that further research using other methodologies should provide answers to important questions related to this topic." Translation: I don't know what the answer to these questions is. But I'm using a lot of big words, so my peers will think I do.
Standardized Academic Voice: this is an essay or article that mixes up two different types of language—academic and common-sense—so that it's hard to tell which part is meant to be clear and which part is supposed to sound smart but actually isn't. Example: "The nation was reeling from the assassination of President Kennedy when Vice President Johnson assumed office." This sentence could have been written by anyone; it has no academic content at all just like my essay writer told in their guide.
Strategic Use of Non-English Vocabulary Words: this is an essay or article full of made-up words in place of English words that mean the same thing. Example: "During the second quarter of fiscal year 2015, there was a decrease in revenues and gross profits resulting from lower sales units, which necessitated an increase in net liabilities as well as higher interest expense expenses."
The Ghostwriter: this is an essay or article written by someone who doesn't know what he/she is talking about but wants us to think he does, so s/he has hired someone else—a ghost writer—to do the heavy lifting. Example: "Arguably, one important factor contributing to this trend was the increasing number of third party studies on air pollution impacts on health outcomes." Translation : I don't know if these are important factors or not I just made that up.
It is important to emphasize again that all of these styles are academic in nature—none of them would be considered acceptable in more casual communications. But each one has its own rules and logic: if you want to get your head around this stuff,cheap essay writer is helpful to understand what those rules and logics might be.